The Famous 57-Second Colour Psychology Quiz
Five questions about what colours mean. Most professionals get two. One of the five cannot honestly be answered at all — and almost nobody notices which one.
Please note that this quiz is not a psychological test. It is not a tool of psychological
analysis. The individual significance of colors depends on other factors. Each individual has
their own unique visual vocabulary influenced by cultural and environmental factors. After
completing the quiz you will receive an e-mail with detailed explanations.
By completing the test you subscribe to the free e-mail course of the Institute of Projective
Drawings. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy
Your score against the colour-symbolism answer key.
The average is two out of five.
Now the part the quiz was really for. Three of these five questions have no honest answer — they ask what a colour means, as though a colour could mean the same thing in two different people. The two you could genuinely get right ask something else entirely: not which colour, but how this person's colours relate to each other.
There is no dictionary for a person.
A dictionary of colours describes everyone — and therefore no one. The same red means one thing in a woman whose mother dressed her in it, another in a man who has just come off a night shift in an emergency room. Nobody is a general case. The SSCA Method is what replaces the dictionary: a seven-step procedure — Seven-Step Configuration Analysis — for understanding this picture, made by this person. It is idiographic: it is built to understand the individual, not the average. It is taught at university level, and it has been taught in 152 courses across eight countries.
The answer key
Green = the answer holds up. Red = the "correct" answer is a dictionary claim, and you should distrust it — including when you got it right.
This one breaks
1. Which is the BIGGEST MISTAKE most women make (because men hate this color on them)?
— Key: Yellow. You answered: —
This is the question that cannot honestly be answered, and it is the reason the quiz exists. Yellow is the answer the magazines give — it comes from preference surveys averaged over thousands of strangers. It says nothing whatsoever about any one man or any one woman. If you picked a colour, you accepted the premise. Almost everyone does.
This one breaks
2. Which is the colour of ANGER?
— Key: Both. You answered: —
In colour–emotion association studies, anger is reliably paired with red and with black — so "both" is the textbook answer. But look at what that actually tells you at the desk: two opposite colours, both "correct", in the same population. A rule that admits both answers is not a rule. It is an average with the person removed.
This one holds
3. Which colour indicates sexual dysfunction (if SEXUALITY has to be associated with a colour)?
— Key: Pale yellow. You answered: —
Not because pale yellow "means" dysfunction. Because of what it is: a washed-out, low-intensity colour standing where a saturated, vital one is expected. What is informative is the drop — this person's own vitality drained out of the concept — and you can only see a drop if you know what this person's saturated colours look like elsewhere. The signal is the deviation, not the hue.
This one holds
4. Which is the most serious symptom?
— Key: If the colour of the IDEAL PARTNER is grey. You answered: —
This is the best question in the quiz. Sadness–dark brown, tenderness–light blue, fear–black: three ordinary, consonant pairings — the colour agrees with the feeling. Only one pairing is dissonant: the most desired figure in a life, given the colour of nothing at all. The finding is not "grey = bad". The finding is a contradiction inside this one person's own set of colours. That is what a professional actually reads.
This one breaks
5. A preference for which of the following colours correlates with NEUROTIC SYMPTOMS?
— Key: Purple. You answered: —
Purple is what the old colour literature claims, and it is the purest example of the trap. A colour preference, on its own, does not tell you that a person has neurotic symptoms — it tells you they like a colour. Statements broad enough to fit anyone feel accurate precisely because they fit anyone. Forer called it the fallacy of personal validation. A symbol dictionary is a machine for producing it.
It's on its way.
Your score and this full key are in your inbox — together with The Five Biggest Mistakes, a chapter from the course itself, and the seven steps Prof. Vass walks through before he will write a single conclusion about a person.
You are also on the early-access list: you get in first when enrolment opens, at the early-bird price. When Prof. Vass runs his first live session in English, the list is invited first, free — reply to the welcome email with your biggest question and it goes on his list for it.
Don't want to wait for enrolment to open? You can create your account and start the full programme now.
Already enrolled? Log in
Prof. Dr. Zoltán Vass — Professor of Psychology, Vice President of the International Society of Psychopathology of Expression and Art Therapy. Humboldt Research Fellow. He has taught this method in Germany, France, Russia, China, the USA and Israel — and has been building artificial intelligence for psychological assessment since 1996.